Roof Trusses Vs Conventional Framing

Also in a structure with exposed roof framing trusses produce a manufactured appearance that may be undesirable.

Roof trusses vs conventional framing.

Ing where floor and roof trusses are used and accommodates 24 inch spacing of studs where wind loads permit or where larger studs are required for thicker in. Roof framing has undergone a quiet revolution over the past half century. As you can see circled in red on the left is a bunch of boards or sticks connected together to support the frame of the roof. Conventional roof framing requirements it is very important that conventionally framed roof systems comply with the provisions of the code section r106 1 1 and section r301 1 respectively.

Additional boards are placed horizontally on the frames to create a complete cover for the structure. Let s go through a few lists of pros and cons of both stick framing and trusses to begin. This first image is from a roof project being constructed using the stick frame technique. Roof framing is one of the most challenging task.

Most types of trusses eliminate your attic space. The roof and ceiling can be attached to the same member. However this doesn t look quite sturdy or safe. The beam or the ridge is the central part of the structure as all the framing must be connected to it.

Trusses are gradually replacing the conventional rafters to the point that nowadays more than 80 percent of new residential construction uses trusses to support the roof. A stick framed roof is made up of individual rafters and that are connected to a top beam. 4 major pros of stick framing.